| {{ 'ml-lesson-number-slides' | message : article.intro.bblockCount }} |
| {{ 'ml-lesson-number-exercises' | message : article.intro.exerciseCount }} |
| {{ 'ml-lesson-time-estimation' | message }} |
If two sides and the included angle of a triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
This proof will be developed based on the given diagram, but it is valid for any pair of triangles.
If two angles and the included side of a triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
This proof will be developed based on the given diagram, but it is valid for any pair of triangles.
If the three sides of a triangle are congruent to the three sides of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
This proof will be developed based on the given diagram, but it is valid for any pair of triangles.
The points C and F′′ are on opposite sides of AB. Now, consider CF′. Let G denote the point of intersection between AB and CF′′.
It can be noted that AC=AF′′ and BC=BF′′. By the Converse Perpendicular Bisector Theorem, AB is a perpendicular bisector of CF′′. Points along the perpendicular bisector are equidistant from the endpoints of the segment, so CG=GF′′.
If two angles and a non-included side of a triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
This proof will be developed based on the given diagram, but it is valid for any pair of triangles.
It is given that two angles of △ABC are congruent to two angles of △BCD′′. Hence, by the Third Angle Theorem, ∠BCD′′ is congruent to ∠BCA.
AB≅AC ⇒ ∠B≅∠C
Consider a triangle ABC with two congruent sides, or an isosceles triangle.
Statement | Reason |
---|---|
∠BAP ≅ ∠CAP | Definition of an angle bisector |
BA ≅ CA | Given |
AP ≅ AP | Reflexive Property of Congruence |
Consider an isosceles triangle △ABC.
A line passing through A and the midpoint of BC will be drawn. Let P be the midpoint.
Since BP and PC are congruent, the distance between B and P is equal to the distance between C and P. Therefore, B is the image of C after a reflection across AP. Also, because A lies on AP, a reflection across AP maps A onto itself. The same is true for P.
Reflection Across AP | |
---|---|
Preimage | Image |
C | B |
A | A |
P | P |
∠B≅∠C ⇒ AB≅AC
This theorem is the converse theorem to the Isosceles Triangle Theorem. It is also known as the Converse Base Angles Theorem.
Consider a triangle ABC with two congruent angles.
Let P be the point of intersection of BC and the angle bisector of ∠A. Since AP is the angle bisector of ∠A, then ∠BAP≅∠CAP.
If two sides of a triangle are congruent to two sides of another triangle, the triangle with the larger included angle has the larger third side.
Based on the diagram above, the following relation holds true.
m∠BAC>m∠B′A′C′⇒BC>B′C′
The Hinge Theorem receives its name because the included angle of the congruent sides acts like a hinge. The more the sides are open, the further away their ends are from each other.
Consider △ABC and △A′B′C such that AB=A′B′ and AC=A′C′, where m∠BAC>m∠B′A′C.
Place a point D′ on △A′B′C′ so that m∠D′A′C′=m∠BAC and A′D′=AB.
Draw △A′C′D′ and △B′C′D′.
Note that two sides of △ABC and their included angle are congruent to two sides of △A′D′C′ and their included angle. Because of the Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem, BC=D′C′. It now suffices to prove that D′C′>B′C′. To do so, note that △A′B′D is isosceles.
BC>B′C′
If two sides of a triangle are congruent to two sides of another triangle, the triangle with the larger third side also has the larger included angle.
Based on the diagram above, the following relation holds true.
BC>B′C′⇒m∠BAC>m∠B′A′C′
This theorem is the converse of the Hinge Theorem.
Consider △ABC and △A′B′C such that AB=A′B′ and AC=A′C′, where BC>B′C′.
This theorem can be proven by contradiction. Since the goal is to prove that m∠BAC>m∠B′A′C′ the opposite statement will be assumed, that is, m∠BAC≤m∠B′A′C′. Because this is a non-strict inequality, both m∠BAC=m∠B′A′C′ and m∠BAC<m∠B′A′C′ have to be considered.
If m∠BAC<m∠B′A′C′ then the Hinge Theorem states that BC<B′C′, but this also contradicts the fact that BC>B′C′.
The assumption that m∠BAC is less than or equal to m∠B′A′C′ contradicts the hypothesis. Therefore, this assumption must be false. Consequently, the initial conclusion of the theorem is true.
m∠BAC>m∠B′A′C′.